reported that Republican lawmaker Rep. Mark Wilt will reintroduce a bill in Kentucky that would make water fluoridation optional for communities. This bill was originally proposed in 2020 but did not pass. Wilt argues that the decision to fluoridate water should be left to local governments, allowing communities to decide what is best for their citizens.
Wilt’s bill would give cities and towns the ability to vote on whether to continue water fluoridation. He believes that this issue should be determined at the local level, rather than mandated by the state. Wilt also argues that fluoride is already present in many products such as toothpaste and that adding it to water may not be necessary.
Proponents of water fluoridation argue that it is a cost-effective way to prevent tooth decay and promote oral health. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has recognized water fluoridation as one of the 10 great public health achievements of the 20th century. Many public health organizations, including the American Dental Association and the World Health Organization, support water fluoridation as a safe and effective way to improve dental health.
However, opponents of water fluoridation raise concerns about potential health risks, including dental fluorosis, skeletal fluorosis, and thyroid dysfunction. Some believe that individuals should have the right to choose whether or not to consume fluoride in their water.
As Rep. Wilt prepares to reintroduce his bill, the debate over water fluoridation in Kentucky is likely to intensify. It remains to be seen whether the bill will gain enough support to pass this time around, or if water fluoridation will continue to be mandatory for communities in the state.
Source
Photo credit news.google.com